Skip to main content

What the NBA's G-League Deal Means for Sports Marketing

The NBA has used the development league as a testing ground in the past. Now it looks to up the ante in sponsorship marketing by signing a long-term deal with Gatorade to be the title sponsor for the league. This has been a common practice both overseas (see Barclays Premier League, although they recently ended that partnership) as well as in the US market (NASCAR). The issue it could raise is around brand ownership. As the Premier League discovered they felt their brand was getting lost through its association with Barclays wherein Consumers either can’t distinguish between the two (i.e.: they think Barclays actually owns the league) or simply refer to it as the sponsored brand hence eliminating the need for a name for the league. No signs that the NBA will actually move in that direction but with jersey sponsorship on the horizon it’s something many marketers will take a great interest in. http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/nba-s-g-league-deal-means-sports-marketing/307985/?utm_source=daily_email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=adage&ttl=1487737744&utm_visit=682760

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Secret to In-N-Out’s Cult Following

In the face of global growth a competitor founded just down the road in the 800 lb. gorilla in QSR known as McDonald’s, not even with the onslaught of the better-for-you burger brands like Shake Shack and in spite of a comparable small geographic footprint In-N-Out Burger has built a cult-like following by maintaining a laser focus on its brand identity of keeping things simple, maniacally executed against that promise and providing a dash of secret menus. https://www.qsrmagazine.com/competition/secret-n-out-s-cult-following?utm_campaign=20170814&utm_medium=email&utm_source=jolt

Is Eddie Lampert doing an Amazon to Amazon?

Back in the day Amazon used to sell books but it also had a strategic approach to broaden it's portfolio. That was to establish a seemingly non-hostile relationship with brick & mortar retailers like Toys 'R Us (see bankruptcy), Borders Books..etc. The goal? To get in front of the customer interaction. Amazon sold itself as an expert in the digital space and allowed for cost efficiencies (i.e: not having to build out a web-site or deal with the head-ache of how to fulfill product or the logistics on from where) from the brick and mortar company to focus on what it did best (selling in a physical store) while letting Amazon manage it's digital footprint which was a low volume mix relative to the traffic that was walking into the brick & mortar stores on a daily basis. But, as we all know now, by insinuating itself in the path to purchase and putting its brand in-between the customer and the brick & mortar brand Amazon was able to create a wedge that has grown...