Skip to main content

In Content vs. Pipes vs. Tech does Disney have a better mouse trap?

In the ever-evolving content vs. pipes vs. tech battle Disney has fired a shot heard ‘round the world by announcing that it will pull all of its content from Netflix. On one side I think, it’s about time! Disney obviously has finally seen the light that Netflix is stealing a page from Amazon’s early playbook by establishing a direct link to the end user by inserting itself between the seller and the buyer. The seller in the Amazon scenario were companies like Toys "R" Us, Borders Books and Target (to name a few) turned over management of their eCommerce platforms to Amazon. But not only did they turn it over management but the actual Consumer experience was Amazon! So Amazon, by default, was who consumers felt they were actually shopping from and we all know how that ended for Borders and many other brick & mortar stores. So rather than letting Netflix Amazon them Disney decides to launch a rival streaming service (kinda late to the game if you ask me. CBS launched one back in 2014!) But then this brings up a good shareholder value question; if my profit is going up as a result of having my content in more places for people to see and for pipe companies like Spectrum or yes Netflix to buy then why not just keep it there rather than taking precious dollars, resources, time and effort to build from the ground-up a Netflix clone that already has a 20 year head-start? Well, the answer is that not only has Netflix Amazoned the content creators but they are pushing to encroach on their core business of creating content. No doubt a reaction to Comcast buying NBCUniversal which essentially gave them both pipes and content as well as more recently the (proposed) acquisition of TimeWarner causing an escalation in the battle. So worst case scenario the pipe companies content either acquired or built in-house eclipses (you know I was going to get that in there because of the upcoming Solar Eclipse!) any content made by the pure play content providers leaving them with nothing to sell and nowhere to sell it. And lest we mention Amazon and not bring up that Amazon too has extended a tentacle into the fray when they launched Amazon Studios (2010) and has generated accolades with recent hits Manchester by the Sea and The Salesman. And if we know anything about Bezos is that he is a long-range thinker. Content providers just need to look at what Amazon has done over a period of time not only to retail but to cloud services, hardware..and the list goes on. What do you think of Disney’s move? Are they delaying the inevitable? Is a dollar just a dollar no matter where you get it from? https://www.recode.net/2017/8/8/16115402/disney-netflix-espn-streaming-service-2018-2019 https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/08/disney-is-ditching-netflix-in-2019-to-launch-its-own-streaming-service/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alibaba Is Spending $2.9 Billion to Challenge Walmart in China

Is this the end of eCommerce and the revival of brick & mortar? With Alibaba’s $2.88 billion purchase of a stake in a top Walmart competitor in the Chinese market one would not be faulted for answering that question affirmatively but this is probably moreso that latest stage of the Imperial Army slowly mowing down the last of the Rebels. Sure companies like Amazon and eBay are never going to forsake their digital platforms but they have wrecked enough carnage in the brick & mortar world to now have a wide enough birth to start becoming omni-channel players. What does this mean for the surviving brick & mortar companies? Be afraid. Be very afraid. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alibaba-spending-2-9-billion-111959145.html

The Grinch Can Steal Christmas

After quite literally handing a head start to Amazon and enabling it to become it’s default connection for Customer’s Toys ‘R Us finds itself the latest victim added to the ever-growing heap at the retail morgue (see: Borders, HH Gregg, Circuit City, RadioShack, Payless Shoes, Sports Authority etc). That and the massive debt load (more than $5 billion) that it took on as a result of (over) leveraged buy-out by PE firms KKR, Bain Capital, and Vornado Realty Trust certainly didn’t help. Toys ‘R US Chairman Dave Brandon said that today the company can operate free from financial constraints with the debt restructured under Chapter 11 and stores are supposed to stay open for the Christmas season where Toys ‘R Us earned 40% of its U.S. sales last year. He went on to say that this should also buy them time to invest in the business by improving the Customer experience (both in store and online). Part of that apparently will include closing underperforming stores whilst remaining locations ...