Skip to main content

Amazon takes off the gloves and makes bold move to buy Whole Foods. Will it work?

In the ever evolving battleground known as the Omnichannel Wars Amazon has dropped what could be the equivalent of an atom bomb in it's agreement to purchase Whole Foods. One article from Chain Store Age (http://www.chainstoreage.com/article/amazon-buying-whole-foods-market?tp=i-H43-Q5S-3mq-5klKX-1u-14Qs-1c-5kr1Q-PxptV&utm_campaign=BreakNew&utm_source=Experian&utm_medium=email&cid=14560&mid=85026709) summed it up nicely stating; Jeff Bezos is a master of PR," said Kelly Sayre, analyst, retail/CPG, IHL Group. "He is brilliant at timing announcements for coopting the news cycle. The drone story and Amazon Go stories of the last two years just happened to coincide with Black Friday weekend. It is not lost on us as analysts that this announcement just happens to coincide with the day(s) that Lidl opened its first stores in the U.S., and Walmart bought Bonobos (http://www.chainstoreage.com/article/walmart-acquire-bonobos?tp=i-H43-Q5S-3ms-5kyiv-1u-14Qs-1c-5l4Q8-11fZ5s&utm_campaign=BreakNew&utm_source=Experian&utm_medium=email&cid=14562&mid=85078193). And it came just after Aldi announced a 3.4 billion level of investment in expanding in the U.S." So adding onto that the Bezos historically looks at the long-game what role does Whole Foods play in the Amazon universe? Is this about Amazon getting a profitable business with high margins while leveraging Amazon's buying power and logistics to drive penetration and scale for Whole Foods? It also now puts Amazon squarely in an even broader competitive set that includes the likes of Acme, Giant, Publix and others that are most likely not looking fondly at the growing list of retail brethren that have been crushed under the Amazon wheels-o-retail and are shuddering in anticipation of trying to figure out how to compete against the likes of Amazon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Facebook Enters the Content Wars

Facebook opened its first volley in the Content Wars (see: Apple vs Amazon vs Netflix vs AT&T/TimeWarner vs Comcast vs Disney vs FOX vs Verizon/Oath). Okay, it wasn’t THAT big of a shot in its bid to broadcast the Indian Premier League (Indian cricket matches) which it lost out to Rupert Murdoch’s Star. What’s interesting to note is that Facebook was looking at live content. Live content, the rule-of-thumb goes, is highly unskippable. Meaning that Consumers will watch the ads for fear of missing something that occurs. Additionally, the content is something that is preferred to be watched in that moment (no one likes to really see a replay of a game or have to avoid ESPN so as not to see the score of a game that they recorded). It also can be cheaper than building content for sitcoms or movies. Could their bid have been a primer for moving in on NFL broadcast rights that come up next year when Verizon’s mobile rights expire?

Louisville reportedly a finalist for NBA expansion

Some good news for my new home town of L'ville that it may, potentially, possibly, could be, rumoured will get an NBA team most likely, if anything by the 2018-19 season. Other finalist include: Seattle, Mexico City, Las Vegas and Vancouver. My personal thoughts? Seattle and Vancouver both already had teams and for whatever the reasons couldn't keep 'em. If the con on Louisville is that it's a college town then what is Las Vegas? Sure the Raiders are rumoured to be moving there but I wouldn't consider it a sports town outside if one considers either betting or betting on sports a sport. As for Mexico City? That is an intriguing one. It would be the first US originated sport to set-up outside of the US/Canada and would certainly fit into the NBA's goal for expansion and growth internationally. Also, if you factor in the population size (i.e: loosely translating the size of an area's population to even sustain a professional sports franchise) then Mexi...